Toxic wvw Enemies

[Virdo.1540]

Im getting sick of it to get annoyed by some Enemies that just block someone to write, spam and insult anyone that just wins an normal fight.

Even worse are these players who wait until you come online to just write tons of messages with insults like from a conveyour belt.

Everytime I go to wvw and maybe kill 2-3 players i got at least one of them writing to me afterwards...

How do you guys&girls think about removing the function to block enemies? or would you wish to keep it?

[Silinsar.6298]

While they're at it I'd love if people who throw siege on your body after chasing you 5vs1 would just randomly get killed and teleported back to spawn without warning.

 

And about blocking: could just take a few min to take effect (if someone spams you a lot the auto spam filter kicks in anyway) and you should not be able to contact enemies when the block is in effect.

 

It seems odd that people are allowed to emote all over the place, be condescending etc. (hard to negate that, thrash "talk" always finds its way) but a chat message that can actually start a civil discussion can be blocked (it can also be toxic, but you can actually get banned for serious insults / threats).

[Rampage.7145]

> @"Virdo.1540" said:

> Im getting sick of it to get annoyed by some Enemies that just block someone to write, spam and insult anyone that just wins an normal fight.

> Even worse are these players who wait until you come online to just write tons of messages with insults like from a conveyour belt.

> Everytime I go to wvw and maybe kill 2-3 players i got at least one of them writing to me afterwards...

> How do you guys&girls think about removing the function to block enemies? or would you wish to keep it?

 

I mean if you get triggered by salty people in PvP u should just stick to PvE my dude, salt and PMs are what most people even play WvW for, just saying, stick to your living story, PvP games are definitelly not for you.

[Virdo.1540]

 

> @"Rampage.7145" said:

> > @"Virdo.1540" said:

> > Im getting sick of it to get annoyed by some Enemies that just block someone to write, spam and insult anyone that just wins an normal fight.

> > Even worse are these players who wait until you come online to just write tons of messages with insults like from a conveyour belt.

> > Everytime I go to wvw and maybe kill 2-3 players i got at least one of them writing to me afterwards...

> > How do you guys&girls think about removing the function to block enemies? or would you wish to keep it?

>

> I mean if you get triggered by salty people in PvP u should just stick to PvE my dude, salt and PMs are what most people even play WvW for, just saying, stick to your living story, PvP games are definitelly not for you.

 

its not that i get triggered, i just get annoyed from so many messages over and over again, esp when im trying to chat with guild members etc.

[UmbraNoctis.1907]

You know that the block function is there to get rid of people spamming annoying messages? So maybe use it instead of requesting a removal?

[Virdo.1540]

cuz its more annoying to block every single raging kid that writes.

Nobody should be able to see which enemy has which accountname.

[schloumou.3982]

> @"Virdo.1540" said:

> cuz its more annoying to block every single raging kid that writes.

> Nobody should be able to see which enemy has which accountname.

 

But what about people on my server? I get offended by them all the time for helping with siege or repairing walls for example. I think nobody should be able to write in this game. Maybe teamchat is ok but wispering needs to go.

[Virdo.1540]

or maybe be able to turn on/off the whispering from strangers or "only friends" etc

[schloumou.3982]

No, then people will act friendly till you add them and start insulting you later.

[Virdo.1540]

but the main problem is, They dont need to try to make players anonymous with names like "Gold-Champion~server~" if their accountnames can be seen anyway

[schloumou.3982]

Yep. Those displayed ranks are kind of insulting too. It only leads to low rank players beeing harassed and focused by the self proclaimed roamers. Needs to be done something.

[AliamRationem.5172]

> @"Virdo.1540" said:

> Im getting sick of it to get annoyed by some Enemies that just block someone to write, spam and insult anyone that just wins an normal fight.

> Even worse are these players who wait until you come online to just write tons of messages with insults like from a conveyour belt.

> Everytime I go to wvw and maybe kill 2-3 players i got at least one of them writing to me afterwards...

> How do you guys&girls think about removing the function to block enemies? or would you wish to keep it?

 

I'd like to keep it. I've only ever had one person get irrationally upset about losing to me. They talked some trash and that was that.

 

On the other hand, I routinely use this "feature" to show respect to worthy opponents and have made a lot of friends this way. One of my favorite things in wvw is fighting against someone I know and then having a laugh afterward about the outcome.

 

I'm in it for the fights and I appreciate other players who are of like mind. I'd like to continue being able to communicate with them.

[Dawdler.8521]

> @"Virdo.1540" said:

> but the main problem is, They dont need to try to make players anonymous with names like "Gold-Champion~server~" if their accountnames can be seen anyway

Why is that the main problem?

 

[ProverbsofHell.2307]

I'm sorry but I really don't believe THAT many people are sending you salty whispers. I WvW all the time and while it does happen, it's far from a daily occurrence. Do you have a bad reputation or something? Seems like people have made you a target for whatever reason.

[SlateSloan.3654]

i play ranked pvp and think the wvw chats are rather harmless

[Nocturnal Lunacy.8563]

> @"Virdo.1540" said:

> Im getting sick of it to get annoyed by some Enemies that just block someone to write, spam and insult anyone that just wins an normal fight.

> Even worse are these players who wait until you come online to just write tons of messages with insults like from a conveyour belt.

> Everytime I go to wvw and maybe kill 2-3 players i got at least one of them writing to me afterwards...

> How do you guys&girls think about removing the function to block enemies? or would you wish to keep it?

 

If you keep getting messages from those your guild runs down and kills then the old adage comes to mind. If everybody else sees a problem and you say its everybody else, the problem is prob you. Think about it. You and your guild are obv doing something causing these "toxic" backlash. So it could be you are the one being toxic in the game and they're responding in like. Narcissism makes you believe everything is everybody else's fault when its actually everybody responding and reacting to you. So if you are toxic you're going to get toxicity in return. Its how everything in the universe works whether IRL or ingame.

[Nocturnal Lunacy.8563]

> @"schloumou.3982" said:

> Yep. Those displayed ranks are kind of insulting too. It only leads to low rank players beeing harassed and focused by the self proclaimed roamers. Needs to be done something.

 

Actually as a (roamer before the advent of the mount) I never attacked anybody under the rank of bronze. I feel they should at least have learned the game by bronze rank. And I even go as far as to just ignore the low rank unless they make it absolutely hard to ignore them then I have to delete them but i dont stomp i just walk away. If they are unlucky some guy will come by and stomp them and i get a "Small Loot Bag" If you all gave out precursors you better believe id be at your spawn all day.

[Nocturnal Lunacy.8563]

> @"SlateSloan.3654" said:

> i play ranked pvp and think the wvw chats are rather harmless

 

theyre entertaining to say the least esp when 2 enemy servers are linked together. The fireworks fly and its a popcorn moment. Sometimes the only reason I log on is for team chat.

[schloumou.3982]

> @"Nocturnal Lunacy.8563" said:

> > @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > Yep. Those displayed ranks are kind of insulting too. It only leads to low rank players beeing harassed and focused by the self proclaimed roamers. Needs to be done something.

>

> Actually as a (roamer before the advent of the mount) I never attacked anybody under the rank of bronze. I feel they should at least have learned the game by bronze rank. And I even go as far as to just ignore the low rank unless they make it absolutely hard to ignore them then I have to delete them but i dont stomp i just walk away. If they are unlucky some guy will come by and stomp them and i get a "Small Loot Bag" If you all gave out precursors you better believe id be at your spawn all day.

 

That's very nobel but we can't rely on self imposed rules here. What we need is damage reduction for lower ranks. A diamond player for example should do max 70% damage against an platinum player.

[ArchonWing.9480]

?

 

I actually regret not screenshotting more of the salt whispers. More valuable than badges of honor, and it just takes 5 clicks or so to hard counter it all.

 

I'll never forget the salt mail I got sent for a forum post though. It was long winded but I never read it. Probably should have; so much salt gone to waste. xD

[Justine.6351]

> @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > @"Nocturnal Lunacy.8563" said:

> > > @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > > Yep. Those displayed ranks are kind of insulting too. It only leads to low rank players beeing harassed and focused by the self proclaimed roamers. Needs to be done something.

> >

> > Actually as a (roamer before the advent of the mount) I never attacked anybody under the rank of bronze. I feel they should at least have learned the game by bronze rank. And I even go as far as to just ignore the low rank unless they make it absolutely hard to ignore them then I have to delete them but i dont stomp i just walk away. If they are unlucky some guy will come by and stomp them and i get a "Small Loot Bag" If you all gave out precursors you better believe id be at your spawn all day.

>

> That's very nobel but we can't rely on self imposed rules here. What we need is damage reduction for lower ranks. A diamond player for example should do max 70% damage against an platinum player.

 

Lolwhat?

[steki.1478]

Idk why people complain about these. I always loved whispers from salty kids then killing them over again. Sadly it doesn't happen often or at all :disappointed:

[AliamRationem.5172]

> @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > @"Nocturnal Lunacy.8563" said:

> > > @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > > Yep. Those displayed ranks are kind of insulting too. It only leads to low rank players beeing harassed and focused by the self proclaimed roamers. Needs to be done something.

> >

> > Actually as a (roamer before the advent of the mount) I never attacked anybody under the rank of bronze. I feel they should at least have learned the game by bronze rank. And I even go as far as to just ignore the low rank unless they make it absolutely hard to ignore them then I have to delete them but i dont stomp i just walk away. If they are unlucky some guy will come by and stomp them and i get a "Small Loot Bag" If you all gave out precursors you better believe id be at your spawn all day.

>

> That's very nobel but we can't rely on self imposed rules here. What we need is damage reduction for lower ranks. A diamond player for example should do max 70% damage against an platinum player.

 

Even if this were a problem-free solution (it isn't), it addresses a non-issue. Players entering a PvP game mode should expect to be attacked by other players. It's quite simply the nature of the game and should never be taken personally. Anyone who can't handle that is playing the wrong game. No change is needed here.

 

Further, you create more problems than you solve with this particular solution. While a high rank requires dedication to the game mode and experience definitely correlates with ability, a roamer is still going to be at an advantage against a zerg player. I've certainly killed more diamond and mithril rank players on my way to my current silver rank than have killed me! You want to handicap them more?

[Silinsar.6298]

> @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > @"Nocturnal Lunacy.8563" said:

> > > @"schloumou.3982" said:

> > > Yep. Those displayed ranks are kind of insulting too. It only leads to low rank players beeing harassed and focused by the self proclaimed roamers. Needs to be done something.

> >

> > Actually as a (roamer before the advent of the mount) I never attacked anybody under the rank of bronze. I feel they should at least have learned the game by bronze rank. And I even go as far as to just ignore the low rank unless they make it absolutely hard to ignore them then I have to delete them but i dont stomp i just walk away. If they are unlucky some guy will come by and stomp them and i get a "Small Loot Bag" If you all gave out precursors you better believe id be at your spawn all day.

>

> That's very nobel but we can't rely on self imposed rules here. What we need is damage reduction for lower ranks. A diamond player for example should do max 70% damage against an platinum player.

 

People would just smurf to gain an advantage. Imo, what would help new players and classes usually unwanted in zergs would be removing rallying of enemy players. Or downed state in general like this week^^

Because rallybotting is the reason commanders don't want certain classes / players in zergs (for a reason, they are a liability). If rallying wasn't a thing a player might not add much to a zerg anyway, but at least he doesn't take away from it (put into a seperate group so boons aren't leeched).

[Shroud.2307]

You're EU aren't you.