Bazsi.2734

> @"Xentera.4560" said: > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > @"Xentera.4560" said: > > > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > > > @"Xentera.4560" said: > > > > > There should be no reason why I get every top stat in my team, and yet my team loses the match 500:499 because the match up was kitten. And then I have to pay for what the matching system did by losing 18 rank points. Any one with half a brain can see this is a kitten system all together. > > > > > Either fix your matching system, or stop rank point penalties for losing. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /endrant > > > > > > > > So you don't want to get punished because you're the best player in that matchup? What? > > > > > > Shocking concept isn't it? > > > > The shocking part is that you'd suggest something like this with a straight face. This feels like a rich person lobbying for tax exemption... > > "My gardener payed 20K in taxes this year, why do I have to pay 10 times as much? We should both be paying 20K, aren't we equals as humans?" > > > > > The only shocking part I see is fanbois defending a clearly flawed system that’s driving players away, and justifying it by the “work” being done on EoD. > > Also, you were misinformed on how a flat tax rate works. > > I was always fascinated by people who think that mentioning an objective fact means agreement or endorsement. They are working on a new X-pac and are neglecting everything else because of it... how do we get from here to "and I think its okay that they are doing so"? I'm pretty sure you're aware you're making straw man, so why are you doing this? About the original rant, the "problems" of the system: I've seen none of which can't be explained by low population. Platinum players being put into high silver/low gold matches after 6-7 minutes of waiting is not something that can be fixed with your suggestion. Also it would just create a way to minimalise your losses even though you're throwing the game. Farming top offense/damage/healing is pretty easy if you tunnel-vision the enemy support on mid. You're absolutely useless, but you'll have 3+ topstats at the end if you manage not to die a lot.

> @"Filip.7463" said: > Like, can u write > “Im renegade, how to deal with burn / dh?” > > Instead of > Nerf burn, nerd dh, nerf trapper rune, nerf voj, nerf spirit swords... > > I mean if people would have asked how to deal with something, there would be much less nerfs That implies that nerfs are always bad. Which they aren't. Also it's implied here that a-net nerfs based on feedback from this forum. Which I think is debateable at best.

> @"Ovark.2514" said: > Phase Traversal requires LoS and only grants the quickness and unblockable on strike > Song of the Mists no longer deals damage Oh yes that overkill damage on Song of the Mists... how would the sevenshot combo even work with that gone? I mean swapping to Shiro/Jalis grants a whopping 27 damage, while swapping to glint/kalla does 80. Did you even read what the skills do before complaining? There are several aspects of the meta renegade that are seriously overtuned but your suggestions touch on none of them.

> @"Xentera.4560" said: > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > @"Xentera.4560" said: > > > There should be no reason why I get every top stat in my team, and yet my team loses the match 500:499 because the match up was kitten. And then I have to pay for what the matching system did by losing 18 rank points. Any one with half a brain can see this is a kitten system all together. > > > Either fix your matching system, or stop rank point penalties for losing. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that. > > > > > > > > > /endrant > > > > So you don't want to get punished because you're the best player in that matchup? What? > > Shocking concept isn't it? The shocking part is that you'd suggest something like this with a straight face. This feels like a rich person lobbying for tax exemption... "My gardener payed 20K in taxes this year, why do I have to pay 10 times as much? We should both be paying 20K, aren't we equals as humans?" My point is if you're the best player in the swamp of baddies, you are meant to hard carry your matches. There are not enough opponents on your level, so you're put in matches several tiers below you. And to average things out, the best and the worst likely gets in the same team. This is what it's like to be a high rated player in a dying PvP scene. I'm not saying it's good that things turned out this way, but there is 0% chance for any of this to change so there is no point of making entitled demands at this company. They are working on EoD and they don't seem to have time to care about things like PvP.

> @"Xentera.4560" said: > There should be no reason why I get every top stat in my team, and yet my team loses the match 500:499 because the match up was kitten. And then I have to pay for what the matching system did by losing 18 rank points. Any one with half a brain can see this is a kitten system all together. > Either fix your matching system, or stop rank point penalties for losing. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that. > > > /endrant So you don't want to get punished because you're the best player in that matchup? What?

> @"Zeesh.7286" said: > Tldr; armor and hp should be same for all classes since the stat sets like zerker are the same and all classes have dps/tank/healer roles (or that is the 'design philosophy' *rolls eyes* of anet). > > In most games, there is magic armor and physical armor. Light armor gives more magic defense vs physical defense compared to Heavy armors. Medium armors have a balance of magic and physical defense. > > GW2 does not have magic defense as a separate metric so why exactly do light, medium and heavy armors exist?? This is even worse when you consider the fact that berserker or minstrel stats on both Heavy and Light armor add the same power/healing bonuses. Who would want to wear Light armor when Heavy armor gives the exact same power stats but with higher defense??? Light armor offers lower defense compared to heavy armor and is absolutely inferior!! Realistically it makes zero sense for anyone to wear light armor in this game by choice except for aesthetics... > > So okay, maybe light armor is for classes that are supposed to be more mobile? Or maybe it is meant to be a balancing factor because Light armor classes are ranged and heavy armor classes are melee based so lower defense and HP is to compensate for the range advantage. BUT... Revs/Guards/Warriors all have viable ranged weapons! And Light armor classes are running melee weapons?? Let's look at Ele which as a class has the lowest HP and Defense. Yet the most viable weapon set for this class is a melee ranged dagger. Revenants wearing a heavy armor are running around with bows! And please don't give the bunker weaver argument. Bunker weaver getting barriers is not a viable way to offset the kitten poor base stats for the class. Core Ele is absolutely garbage. The barriers and evades feel like a way to compensate the flaws in the design and whenever they try to compensate they often give either too much or not enough.. > > Right now what seems to be happening is that Anet made random decisions when the game originally appeared while creating classes without planning what they wanted each class to excel at or be bad at to balance them all out and now every balance attempt is a hotfix to mitigate issues originally rooted in the shortsighted class designs. If you want every class to be have a viable tank/dps/healer variant then every class needs to at least have some sort of level core base no? Otherwise build these classes to only suit certain roles. Heavy armors should be tanks/ supports. Medium should be DPS, Light should be CC users? Right now they're trying to give every class the ability to play each role and it's not turning out well leading to ultimately only a few classes with a few select builds being viable in a competitive game... > > I really hope Anet takes a meaningful look at base stats for all classes and starts balancing by establishing some principles at least. Why does an ele deserve lowest HP/Defense pool vs. a Rev when both are running a berserker set which gives out the same power/precision/ferocity stats. The ele gets 2 shot in wvw zergs while the rev runs around with blocks and evades while having higher defense and HP? > > Anyway I get that at this point asking anet to make some sort of sensible and rationalized design choices while developing game mechanics is a stretch... I mean... like... this is a game where we have greatswords shooting laser beams on mesmers, hammers on revs having 1200 range meanwhile a Holosmith gets more melee range on their SWORD in forge mode compared to a Warrior wielding a GREATSWORD.. anyway rant/questioning/suggestions whatever over. Classes having different base healthpools and having different sustain/defensive tools is part of their design. If you standardise armor and health, how would a warrior fight an elementalist? As things stand, a sidenoder sage weaver already forces a sidenoder warrior off of the capture point. Boosting ele health would mean an elementalist can take a more offensive amulet, so you'd have to rebalance (basicly nerf) ele damage. And if you just raise the health/armor of squishies only to nerf their damage/sustain, all you end up with is a lot of standardized classes which feel the same. Picking a class would be just picking the color of your animations and nothing else.

> @"Kuma.1503" said: > Patch Preview: > > Renegade: > Sevenshot nerf. Sustain cut. > > Dragonhunter: > SoJ power coeff reduced. Traited burning reduced. 1 less charge in PvP > > Holosmith: > Grenade Barrage damage reduced to 0.1 per grenade (It almost does as much dps as Shrapnel Grenade. Nerfed so that it's weaker than the auto attack.) > > Thief: > Shadow arts nerf. Increased ini on heartseeker to 4 (dagger is obv overperforming compared to other mh weapons) > > Mesmer: Mirage endurace regeneration cut by 50%. (Too many evades even with one dodge) > > Ranger: Jacaranda no longer selectable in PvP. > > Weaver: All burning applied now instantly cleanses itself. They chill themselves when attuning to water. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Removed: > > Trapper Rune (too much stealth) > Divinity Rune (Obviously overperforming based on usage) > Resistance Rune (Makes builds too tanky) > > Rabid Amulet (too much toughness. Enables earth weaver) > > > > > > > > > Dont. A-net might listen to you!

This would set a bad precedent. If thief can have different initative costs tied to elite specialisations, and mirage already has a 50 enudrance penality PVP ONLY... we'd be getting dangerously close to a situation where anyone could demand any change that would tore into whatever little consistency this game has left. You solve this problem by not having 8 initative skills in the game period. Partial revert is worse than nothing, because if a-net grants you this, why would they not partial revert grenade kit for scrapper/core engi etc.... and we'd end up with a game where everything is an exception, a special case, a unique situation, and learning the game would become a long and frustrating experience that way less people would want to do.

Warrios GS 5 used to be totally unreliable, then they changed the code so now Rush is a homing missile. Couple that with the changes to chill/cripple no longer effecting mobility skills, and it gets really annoying. However it's not an easy fix, we reported this exact problem back in 2013/14, so this is nothing new. They are not bothering to fix problems which aren't completely game breaking so thats nothing new either... we reported a bunch of dungeon exploits back than which are still in the game. They "fixed" thsoe by making dungeons irrelevant... so careful with the complaints, they might "fix" greatsword warrior the same way.

> @"DoomNexus.5324" said: > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > I know something like this would happen: > > I get into/make a team, we're obviously nowhere near to where we could be with enough practise, so we start Q-ing, and... first opponent is one of the top contestants of winning the monthly. We get curbstomped, but lets say we keep on playing... somehow most of our matches turn out like this. Because the veterans of the tournament system(those playing organised 5v5 for years) would stick to their own skill level while making teams, and Q-dodge each other for safe/slow rating farm. > > New teams would have a horrible experience, seasoned tournament veterans would be bored by lack of competition, and with players leaving (why play if it's not fun?) the gamemode would completely die out within a month or two. > > I don't even disagree with you here, just one question: How is this different from current ATs? > Are ATs superior because they limit the frequency of getting stomped by introducing super long waiting times between those matches? Idk. It's not different from AT-s in this regard. I don't play AT-s either. Had a few attempts with friendlies, we had a few bye-s and curbstomps, then we got stomped. Not one match was even close to balanced. It was a sad mockery of what tournaments in GW1 used to look like, so I just stuck to soloQ since. There is a minimal population in the AT system because you can claim free rewards for even entering at this point.

This is a perfectly topical forum post... for early 2018. Since then the playerbase deteriorated too much for this change. Lets say teamQ is separated, even if all current pvp players join a team(which is definitely not going to happen, only a precentage of them), you'd get like 50 teams on EU, less on NA. If this change went through, I wouldn't play the gamemode because I know something like this would happen: I get into/make a team, we're obviously nowhere near to where we could be with enough practise, so we start Q-ing, and... first opponent is one of the top contestants of winning the monthly. We get curbstomped, but lets say we keep on playing... somehow most of our matches turn out like this. Because the veterans of the tournament system(those playing organised 5v5 for years) would stick to their own skill level while making teams, and Q-dodge each other for safe/slow rating farm. New teams would have a horrible experience, seasoned tournament veterans would be bored by lack of competition, and with players leaving (why play if it's not fun?) the gamemode would completely die out within a month or two. So sadly the "population is low" argument is valid, no matter how stupid you think it is. Until EoD releases, it's just slow decay for us.

Ranger pets do not die, they cease to exist when swapped out/melded. To make stuff like Deadeye's Mark work properly on them, you'd have to do lots of coding, which A-net simply wont allocate resources to do right now. Only ever mark pets if you're sure the ranger is about to swap them out/meld with them. That way you get an instant recharge on mark and get a double proc out of your traits(boons, healing from mug etc). You're right it would be neat if marking a pet worked properly, but all you can do in the current situation is exploiting the anomaly. Because it won't get corrected before they release EoD.

> @"Filip.7463" said: > > @"Math.5123" said: > > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > > @"Filip.7463" said: > > > > > @"Ragnar.4257" said: > > > > > > @"Filip.7463" said: > > > > > > > @"Math.5123" said: > > > > > > > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said: > > > > > > > > > @"Math.5123" said: > > > > > > > > > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said: > > > > > > > > > > > @"Brokensunday.4098" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > @"Curennos.9307" said: > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd rather they add a little more...What to call it, variety? Depth? To the setup. Traps as a concept are all well and good, but maybe it isn't a good idea to have a trap with such narrow counters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stability, blocks, ports out, invul. Does not seem narrow at all to counter it .. just saying if you get stuck on it with 0 cooldows yes i see how you can die to it but thats not dm fault. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stability works. > > > > > > > > > > invuln works > > > > > > > > > > block does not work, you get cced back into the trap > > > > > > > > > > teleports kind of work, you do teleport but when teleport ends you still get knocked down. > > > > > > > > > > As a mesmer I never really gave a kitten cuz I had jaunt/blink and F4, but when I started playing ranger its kitten awfull. > > > > > > > > > > god forbids you dont have 100% cooldowns else you dead from full hp, no counterplay. > > > > > > > > > > like the only thing you can do is dodge out, and use stun-break during knockdown animation, and hope to gods that the trap bugs and lets you out, otherwise you die from full hp > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On ranger you have 3/4 cleanse utilities. Meaning you can cleanse the stacks whenever they get out of hand if you don't have the stability to get out. How is this any different from the old holo that could 100 to zero you in a prime light beam you didn't dodge? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difference is that holo cant do that anymore and DH can. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don't get me wrong, burn dh is beyond dumb. But Maw or damage isn't the reason. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any class with triple offensive trait-lines and no stunbreak will be able to pump. Just remove trapper runes and the build will be gone. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then trapper ranger is also gone, killing 2 builds for reason of one? > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone really want to see trapper rangers every game? It's just as obnoxious, just not as effective. Same with old trapper thief. > > > > > > > > With removing the rune they destroy one build that was not needed to be destroyed. > > > > > > And by keeping the rune they destroy an enitre gamemode that was not needed to be destroyed lol. Are we seriously justifying trapper DH with trapper ranger now? > > > > Agreed, the rune is anti fun to play against. Its just that trap dh is a stronger build than trap ranger. They are both equally unfun to play vs. > > nerf other things on dh then - VoJ maybe? Trapper rune destroys multiple builds if it gets removed DH without trapper runes is a non-issue. I'd go a step further and say it needs minor buffs, because it's not really viable in high end PvP. To butcher an already weak spec because of a rune is the bad way to go about it.

> @"Filip.7463" said: > > @"Ragnar.4257" said: > > > @"Filip.7463" said: > > > > @"Math.5123" said: > > > > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said: > > > > > > @"Math.5123" said: > > > > > > > @"Leonidrex.5649" said: > > > > > > > > @"Brokensunday.4098" said: > > > > > > > > > @"Curennos.9307" said: > > > > > > > > > I'd rather they add a little more...What to call it, variety? Depth? To the setup. Traps as a concept are all well and good, but maybe it isn't a good idea to have a trap with such narrow counters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stability, blocks, ports out, invul. Does not seem narrow at all to counter it .. just saying if you get stuck on it with 0 cooldows yes i see how you can die to it but thats not dm fault. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stability works. > > > > > > > invuln works > > > > > > > block does not work, you get cced back into the trap > > > > > > > teleports kind of work, you do teleport but when teleport ends you still get knocked down. > > > > > > > As a mesmer I never really gave a kitten cuz I had jaunt/blink and F4, but when I started playing ranger its kitten awfull. > > > > > > > god forbids you dont have 100% cooldowns else you dead from full hp, no counterplay. > > > > > > > like the only thing you can do is dodge out, and use stun-break during knockdown animation, and hope to gods that the trap bugs and lets you out, otherwise you die from full hp > > > > > > > > > > > > On ranger you have 3/4 cleanse utilities. Meaning you can cleanse the stacks whenever they get out of hand if you don't have the stability to get out. How is this any different from the old holo that could 100 to zero you in a prime light beam you didn't dodge? > > > > > > > > > > difference is that holo cant do that anymore and DH can. > > > > > > > > Don't get me wrong, burn dh is beyond dumb. But Maw or damage isn't the reason. > > > > > > > > Any class with triple offensive trait-lines and no stunbreak will be able to pump. Just remove trapper runes and the build will be gone. > > > > > > Then trapper ranger is also gone, killing 2 builds for reason of one? > > > > Does anyone really want to see trapper rangers every game? It's just as obnoxious, just not as effective. Same with old trapper thief. > > With removing the rune they destroy one build that was not needed to be destroyed. And by keeping the rune they destroy an enitre gamemode that was not needed to be destroyed lol. Are we seriously justifying trapper DH with trapper ranger now?

> @"Ryuk.6840" said: > If you mean that equipping Longbow should pulse Superspeed, i am on with that . > Most Guardians will drop the stay on base strategy , and will aim to survive by kitting > You know, human nature :P I mean... this would devalue movement hacks a lot. You could catch up to those teleporting to sidenode before they decap. I'd love to see them implement ideas like this for an april fools patch.

> @"Kaburro.4712" said: > > @"Norbe.7630" said: > > Warrior is my least played class in PvP. > > I think the images shows why. > > It took 3 or more screenshots to kill you while for example on my 2nd least played class the mesmer, it will only take one screenshot of combat log to down a core shout guardian > > Took me 3 screenshots to describe 2 seconds > It couldn't have taken 2 seconds, just count the resolve ticks, and after your f2 activation the regeneration ticks. That alone tells us that the time it took for you to go down was at least 5 seconds. During which time you evaded exactly 0 attacks btw. Here is what we can reconstuct based on the logs: You walked up to a berserker(or he walked up to you), and you tanked all of its burst without dodgeing/blocking/stunbreaking, and in 5+ seconds you actually went into downstate. Anyone and anything should die to a full offensive meme build if they do not react for that long. There is nothing to see here, this is perfectly fine.

Finally an important discussion.

> @"mes.4607" said: > > @"Math.5123" said: > > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > > @"mes.4607" said: > > > > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > > > > @"mes.4607" said: > > > > > > Please make it so the 25% movement speed is permanent, so it doesn't matter if you use F2 or not. Small change that will allow DHs to run non movement speed runes; currently rely on stuff like Trapper and Lynx. After sinking an ungodly amount of hours into this elite spec, I can tell it was meant to be mobile > > > > > > > > > > It was only meant to be more mobile than core guard. Which it is. 1200(1500) range on longbow and area denial with traps gives DH a kit that does not need insane mobility. It already has multiple gapclosers and F2, thats enough. In a world where thieves(i am speed) getting mobility nerfs, DH does not need a mobilty buffs. > > > > > > > > Playing DH without some type of movement speed rune is a terrible experience > > > > > > So pick a movement speed rune. Problem solved. > > > > Constructive as always. > > He literally brought us back to the reason for my post Which is that you have to pick a rune to compensate one of the weaknesses of your kit. Below average mobility is one of the defining characteristics of a guardian. It's bad enough that you can compensate for it with a rune, now you want it baseline... classes are meant to be different. And like it or not, DH is a guardian.

> @"mes.4607" said: > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > @"mes.4607" said: > > > Please make it so the 25% movement speed is permanent, so it doesn't matter if you use F2 or not. Small change that will allow DHs to run non movement speed runes; currently rely on stuff like Trapper and Lynx. After sinking an ungodly amount of hours into this elite spec, I can tell it was meant to be mobile > > > > It was only meant to be more mobile than core guard. Which it is. 1200(1500) range on longbow and area denial with traps gives DH a kit that does not need insane mobility. It already has multiple gapclosers and F2, thats enough. In a world where thieves(i am speed) getting mobility nerfs, DH does not need a mobilty buffs. > > Playing DH without some type of movement speed rune is a terrible experience So pick a movement speed rune. Problem solved.

> @"mes.4607" said: > Please make it so the 25% movement speed is permanent, so it doesn't matter if you use F2 or not. Small change that will allow DHs to run non movement speed runes; currently rely on stuff like Trapper and Lynx. After sinking an ungodly amount of hours into this elite spec, I can tell it was meant to be mobile It was only meant to be more mobile than core guard. Which it is. 1200(1500) range on longbow and area denial with traps gives DH a kit that does not need insane mobility. It already has multiple gapclosers and F2, thats enough. In a world where thieves(i am speed) getting mobility nerfs, DH does not need a mobilty buffs.

> @"Pati.2438" said: > @"Bazsi.2734" Bro what are you talking about. Take a Look at the whole meta builds and you will see that he is just right ...... (renegate= spaming heroes and hammers aoe plus sevens shot/ core necro spam aoe weekness press Licht and kill all with 1 Button smash/ ele = okay it need hard skill but at least its also aoe Burn/ burn dh= yea full Trapper plus sword of justice .... nothing more to say here/ holo = feels so like its passive aoes doing more damage than its weapon skills/ Healbraker = shouts spam ... nothing more thsn right aoe heal) sure there are some 1v1 decap builds that are also strong but the only reason they playable are just knockbacks and the lack of Stability in the whole pvp game Mode. > > > P.S. This meta actually is just clearly a mid fight meta where mid fight classes are near as strong in 1v1 as side node classes. Why? Cause the most Side note builds are hard damage nerfed and a mid fighter is ways too long needed to kill My main point was that brainless AoE spam is less effective the higher you go in ratings. Listing a bunch of builds using AoE-s does nothing to dispute that. Also, the lack of punctuation hurts my eyes and brain. If I misinterpreted your point, try again with a properly formatted text, as I am clearly too dumb to read this.

> @"Bingus.4236" said: > > @"Bazsi.2734" said: > > > @"Artyrim.1945" said: > > > I'm a noob and after playing pvp for few weeks all I can say is : AOE AOE AOE AOE AOE AOE for win . And if the class has aoe cond skills is even better > > > Skills? Aim? Tactics? Assist ? Who cares! > > > Just have a team with 2-3 Aoes like pala and ren and you don't need a brain to win. > > > Ofc I go alone vs 2-3 people but they don't target me just spam aoe/ aoe with cond and they can kill me.. Is really frustrating to loss just because this ,when you can own them in a 1 vs 2-3 without aoe ( as mesmer), my stealth is almost useless and my clones can't stay alive for 1 sec... > > > > > > > > > Is the organized high end pvp just a spam of aoe ?? > > > > You have not reached "high end pvp" just yet. You're calling burn guardians "pala", thats how I know. > > The post started with "I'm a noob", wasn't that enough of a clue ? > I love it when people react to the only part of my comment not worth reacting to.

PvP is the worst it ever was, but thats because the gamemode is kind of dead right now. There is no matchmaking without players. Check back when EoD releases, even with way worse balance(I cannot imagine them releasing balanced e-specs after PoF) it will be better just because there will be huge spike in player numbers.

I incurred anger directed at me many times for typing during fights, it's always done by players who literally stop playing the game for 15+ seconds to type out a 5 word sentence. Whats funny is that most players who complain about my usage of teamchat don't read what I write, they only glance at chat to see that I typed at all. I often have oustanding discussions like: **Me: "Playername don't go far you'll die!"** - The necro goes far and dies. **Me: "Stop going far"** - Necro does it again. **Me: "Nice meme"** - Necro stops right after jumping down from the spawning platform, not moving for a good 20+ seconds, then this appears in the chat: **Necro: "Stop typing and play noob classname. We're losing because you're typing instead of playing"** Which is entertaining, but also highlights that some people assume that just because they cannot type during gameplay, others can't either. Years of experience and superior mechanical skills let you type more often than not. A 3 word sentence takes 2 seconds to type out for me, its not that hard to find 2 seconds while autorunning or capping/decapping.

So what happens if I converse in that subforum, but my rating decays because reasons... will my posts get deleted? Will I be unable to answer in an already ongoing discussion? Also what stops someone from buying a boost from a top player to post their biased stuff or outright troll? Not a bad idea in itself, but I can't see a good way to implement it. You'll have to settle for the discord.